Probably not. He works in mysterious ways.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
When McCain gets his butt kicked...
Probably not. He works in mysterious ways.
Quote
~ Cynthia Boaz | Welcome to Gilead, Governor Palin http://www.truthout.org/093008R“By accepting the position on the GOP ticket despite her astonishing lack of qualifications, Palin signaled that she was prepared to be used - on the basis of her sex alone - in exchange for the promise of status and power.”
Ho ho ho…
Email Subscriptions Now Available
Subscribing will get you an email in the morning around 7:00 AM, so that you can have blog goodness with your Wheaties. It contains links to each post from the last 24 hours, along with a short blurb extracted from the first paragraph or each.
Please consider subscribing.
A Bit of Hypocrisy, or is it just Sour Grapes?
The collapse of the proposed rescue plan for the teetering financial system was the product of a larger failure — of political leadership in Washington — at a moment when the world was looking to the United States to contain the cascading economic crisis.Don't get me wrong. I was very much in favor of the rescue plan (or "bailout," if you prefer), and I am about as far from a Republican as you can get. However, I'm seeing an interesting dichotomy, bordering on hypocrisy, in statements from the media and other parties.
From the White House to Congress to the presidential campaign trail, the principal players did not rally the votes they needed in the House. They appeared not to comprehend or address in a convincing way an intense strain of opposition to the deal among voters. They allowed partisan politics to flare at sensitive moments. Read the rest ...
It has long been a complaint in various quarters that the legislators in Washington go about their own agendas, paying no attention whatever to the will of the people. Yet here we have a situation where, according to the politicians and the media, public opinion as reflected in phone calls and emails was running ~100:1 against the rescue plan. Voila! The politicians killed the bill, and whether or not it was in the pols own best interest as well, it was still what the vast majority of the people apparently wanted. Now everyone is complaining that the politicians sold out.
What's up with that?
http://ping.fm/No0Np
Monday, September 29, 2008
Whooeeee...
In other news, B&B investment bank was nationalized by the UK, and Fortis was rescued by a consortuim of three countries -- probably France, Belgium and The Netherlands (just a guess).
One happy note: it's going to be an absolute riot watching Sarah Palin try to deal with all this during the debate. We'll see what her economic chops can do against the head of the Senate Finance Committee.
House Rejects $700B Wall St. Bailout Legislation
http://ping.fm/j06zH
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
McCain Grandstanding...did it muddy the waters and stall the agreement?
If you doubt that McCain's moves were about rescuing his candidacy rather than our economy, consider how his proposal to suspend the presidential campaign came about.E. J. Dionne Jr. - The Photo McCain Wanted - washingtonpost.com
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Anti-Palin Rally In Anchorage Draws 1400-plus, about three times the number who were at the Pro rally
Do A Good Thing, And Send A Message To Sarah
all make a donation to Planned Parenthood in Sarah Palin's name.
And here's the good part: when you make a donation to PP in her name,
they'll send her a card telling her that the donation has been made in
her honor.
Here's the link to the Planned Parenthood website:
https://secure.ga0.org/02/pp10000_inhonor
You'll need to fill in the address to let PP know where to send the 'in Sarah Palin's honor' card. I suggest you use the address for the McCain campaign headquarters, which is:
c/o McCain for President
1235 S. Clark Street
1st Floor
Arlington , VA 22202
PS: make sure you use that link above or choose the pulldown of Donate--Honorary or Memorial Donations, not the regular 'Donate Online'
[Thanks to Steve Waskow and Steve Bass.]
Monday, September 22, 2008
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Saturday, September 20, 2008
South of the Line
That conflict was not about slavery and the rights of all men. It was about economics, as have been virtually all wars throughout history. If slavery had not been available to whip up popular support for the war, then something else would have had to have been found as was, for example, the USS Maine issue a few years later. The outcome of the conflict, apart from hundreds of thousands dead and maimed, was simply to re-cement the economic interests of the eastern states. It did not materially improve the lot of people of color. That was and is a slow and ongoing process. What it did accomplish was the polarization of North and South into an "us vs. them" mindset that has poisoned the air ever since.
I grew up in the Deep South during the last days of segregation. I saw the plight of black people then, and I see it now. The Civil Rights Act has been in effect for forty years, and people are still arguing about the proper ways to implement its provisions. This is a function, again, of economics. An industrial society - perhaps any society - needs a class of people who are sufficiently depressed economically to be willing to work cheaply and do jobs that the so-called Upper Classes don’t want to do themselves. The Irish, the Polish, the Welsh, Jews, Eastern Europeans, Blacks, Hispanics and, now, Indios from Central America have all filled, or are presently filling, that niche. Inevitably, as one group improves its lot, another slides into the lower economic level and begins its struggle upward. This isn’t good. It just is. Thus. This, too, is about economics.
The rich mixture of the races in the South gave us a great deal to be proud of, and that needs looking at. The unusual combination of poor Europeans, blacks, native Americans and the varied national interests that controlled the South for three hundred years and more gave us jazz, Creole and Cajun cooking, Zora Neale Hurston, Tennessee Williams, NASCAR, soul food, bar-be-que...we could increase the list ad infinitum. The New South includes Atlanta, one of the most vibrant cities in the world, Miami - capital of Latin America, Houston, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Birmingham, Tampa, Norfolk, New Orleans, Jacksonville, and other regional and national economic and cultural centers that rival any cities of their size, anywhere.
The South is also the home of Southern hospitality, good manners, folks who hold doors for each other and remove their hats when they come indoors. It’s a slower paced lifestyle that most outsiders find captivating, once they get used to it. It’s the place where (native) folks say, "Bless his heart," instead of, "That @$$%@**!! just cut me off! It’s cotillion and coon hunting, politics and paw-paws, growth and grits. It’s a rich mix of cultures, seasoned over centuries. It’s the home of the best college football teams in the country, Disney World and South Beach. It’s where Northern transplants complain about the drivers, forgetting that most of them learned to drive up north. It’s a place where you can find a Mayan, a Haitian, a Cuban, a German tourist, a Vietnamese and a redneck in (not "on") the same line at the supermarket...having conversations with each other.
It’s a lot of other things, too, but mostly it’s home. No way I’d change that.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Researchers link BPA exposure to diabetes, heart disease, liver disorders
...there are some steps consumers can take to avoid BPA. A Japanese study of college students suggested that the major dietary source of BPA was canned beverages. Glass and recyclable plastic soda and water bottles do not contain polycarbonates.
Glass baby bottles are safe, and at least one company makes plastic baby bottles containing no BPA.
Nonrecyclable plastic containers that are made with polycarbonates are marked with the number 7 on the bottom. BPA leaching can be reduced by not microwaving food in such containers. Researchers link BPA exposure to health concerns - Los Angeles Times
Monday, September 15, 2008
Email Tips
That got me to thinking about smart emailing, so I thought I'd mention a few things that certainly apply as far as I'm concerned, and might make your own email experience a bit more productive and pleasant.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
What a Crock of Crap!
dear mr curmudgeon [honest!]
a man's home is his castle, and it is his privelege to stayin it and protect it and his family as he sees fit. it is the job of police and other emergency personel to help citizens when they needed it is what they are paid for, and everyone has a right to expect there services. who are u to judge the decisions of ppl who want to save there property. u suck.
I was tempted to publish this nincompeep's (not a typo) address, but decided not to.
Do you believe it? This moronic excuse for a civil libertarian -- or whatever he thinks he is (or she), believes emergency personnel should be put in harm's way at the whim of every fool who wants to prove how macho he is, or is too drunk -- or just too stupid -- to overcome the inertia and denial and take care of himself in an emergency.
Listen, dingbat: if you're so set on a man's privelege to do as he pleases, then it would only be logical for you to not want public services at all.
You're like many of the so-called Libertarians I've come across. They don't want the government interfering with their lives, telling them to wear seatbelts, how they can build their houses, and so on and so forth, but they're perfectly willing to drive on roads built with tax money, collect insurance that has higher premiums for everyone because of idiots who don't wear restraints in cars (or wear their helmets), utilize public water and sewer systems, and the other benefits of being overburdened by government.
You whiny assholes burn my butt like a five-foot flame. What a childish way of looking at society! Listen, turkey, every privilege carries with it a corresponding responsibility. If you take from the government, you take on the responsibility not only of paying for the government, but for learning how it works, voting to insure that it stays on the right track, and otherwise acting like a citizen instead of a leech.
The other side of that coin is, if you don't want to do those things go someplace and try to live without power, sewer service, medical care, insurance, social security, federal, state and locally funded highways and infrastructure -- including rescuing you from your own stupidity -- and all the other things government gives you, including protection from two-legged predators.
As for expecting cops, firemen and their colleagues to bail you out of trouble of your own making -- just be very thankful that there are people that dedicated, because your inconsiderate, ungrateful self would be rotting in a flooded attic before this ex-cop came to bail you out.
Well, of course, that's not true, because your wife and kids would need help and we might as well drag your sorry ass out, too. That way you could live with the shame, which you'd richly deserve.
Don't tell me that cops and others have their duty, unless you want to accept that you have a duty to behave sensibly. Lord have mercy! Are you the kind of idiot that made this country so great? No wonder it's falling down around our ears.
Jerk.
Hurricanes are one of nature's ways...
Heroes rescuing idiots. 'Twere ever thus.
GALVESTON, Texas (AP) - Rescue crews canvassed neighborhoods inundated by Ike's storm surge early Sunday morning, racing against time to save those who spent a second harrowing night trapped amid flattened houses, strewn debris and downed power lines.It's race against time to save Ike stalwarts
One team of paramedics, rescue dogs and structural engineers fanned out under a nearly full moon on a finger of land in Galveston Bay. Authorities hoped to spare thousands of Texans—140,000 by some estimates who ignored orders to flee ahead of Hurricane Ike—from another night among the destruction. Some had been rescued, but unknown thousands remained stranded. ...
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Take Two Quarks And Call Me In The Morning
For those who have managed to remain on the far side of the moon for the past week or so, the LHC is a souped-up atom smasher. Using powerful electromagnets, it accelerates protons through a 17-mile tunnel in opposite directions until they reach nearly the speed of light (roughly 186,350 miles per second). Then they collide with each other, busting into tiny little pieces. Just what kind of tiny pieces will tell us a great deal that we don't yet understand about the way matter is put together, along with other things like how the universe may have looked an infinitesimal period of time after its beginning, and other cool stuff.
[The US was well on the way to having one of these babies of its own, only bigger, when the Pubs got control of Congress and killed the project. Now we get to suck hind tit and hope that the 60-odd nations who collaborated on the LHC will share the new things they learn with American scientists. Sweet.]
Anyway, one of the things that might be created is a little bitty black hole. Now black holes (properly called singularities) are noted for sucking up stuff in large quantities and tearing it apart into sub-atomic particles by means of their incredible gravity, then depositing it...someplace else. Really elsewhere. In fact, there are only theories about where "elsewhere" might be, but it's a pretty sure thing that we wouldn't want to go there -- although after having been torn into sub-atomic particles we might not care.
And there's the problem. Unaware of the (mathematical) fact that teensy-tiny little black holes collapse into themselves and disappear, some folks seem to have gotten sort of excited about the possibility of having one in the neighborhood. Their concern is that it might eat up the Large Hadron Collider, Europe, the Earth, and then start on the solar system.
Now, before you get excited about that (mathematical) fact, and say that it's just a theory and it could be wrong, let me remind you that black holes themselves are just a "theory." No one has ever seen one, and no one ever will because their (theoretical) gravity is so great that they pull the surrounding light inside so that there's nothing to see. We know they're there because the matter being torn apart releases a lot of radiation. So, we have the interesting situation of people believing one "theory," but not believing a corollary that is just as well-proven (baby black holes can't survive) and getting all excited about it.
Sometimes you want to scream, and then you realize that it's not their fault. Education in this country has been dumbed down over the years, for whatever reasons. It couldn't have happened by accident. Instead of worrying about quantum physics, folks need to be worrying about the ignorance of people who have the power of thermonuclear bombs at their fingertips, can't pronounce "nuclear," and still think the Earth was created in six days.
I have a headache now.
View the Large Hadron Collider WebCam
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Well, maybe not *totally* pay attention to the issues...
Buckling Down and Paying Attention
Enough sniping about Gov. Palin. The more we bitch and snark about her, the more we solidify her main constituency (and yes, I referred to her as "McCain's Redneck Babe" -- for the last time, I think). See the article here for elaboration on that.
It's fun bitching and sniping, and believe me I'm not about to stop. But it's easy to bitch and snipe about the wrong things. We need to stay on message, the same as Barack and everyone else.
There are specific reasons why sensible people are sick of the Republicans. There's the economy, there's the war and failure to take care of our veterans, there's the deficit, the health care issue, the problem of infrastructure deteriorating while we "rebuild" Iraq (read "give money to our Iraqi toadies and contractor friends), our inability to keep enough jobs, our failure to prepare workers for the inevitable export or downright failure of some industries by providing training in new jobs, the housing market and mortgage company failures -- direct results of Republican deregulation -- trillions of dollars worth of debt, protectionist policies that fail to take into account the realities of a global economy that is going to happen -- with or without US -- and on, and on, and on.
THE ONLY CHANCE we have of siphoning off Republican votes is to pound, pound, pound on the REAL ISSUES, not bullshit. That stuff splatters, and we have enough of it smeared on America -- courtesy of Little George and the Puppeteers -- to last a hundred years at least.
That is exactly what they want us to do. They want us to concentrate on cosmetics for swine while Rome is stolen out from under our noses. AGAIN!
See, they have to do that. They have no choice, because they have no coherent excuses or solutions for the problems we all have. But they do have a coherent strategy: it's called Distract and Conquer -- and it works. It worked in 2000, and again in 2004. It is an effective strategy, and it will work again if we're stupid enough to let it.
We can't count on the mainstream media. They're grinding the Republican axe. The only independent media left in this country are a few magazines and the Web. If you want to get all high-falutin' (but accurate, nonetheless), WE ARE THE PROTECTORS OF LIBERTY IN THIS COUNTRY.
But don't forget. They sell computers and bandwidth to Republicans, too. We've got to do a better job than them, and the way to do it is to stick to the issues. Pound, pound, pound on the issues. The one thing the Republicans do far, far better than Democrats is organize and stick to a strategy. We have to beat them at that game, too.
Or maybe you want to lose again. It would sure give us all a lot to bitch and snipe about -- until they figured out a way to shut us up. Give them another 8 years, and there's an excellent chance that they will.
Pocahontas (1995) is a travesty of historical accuracy
Having seen the error of their ways, the English and the natives in Pocahontas all make friends, and then a pug and a racoon get married. Not strictly accurate, but then the truth is hardly Disney-friendly territory.
Pocahontas (1995) is a travesty of historical accuracy | Film | guardian.co.uk
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Ignore The Bullshit And Deal With The Reality
Hell no! (I typed "ho" instead of "no" twice; some kind of Freudian slip, no doubt.)*
The Pubs are terrified of having to take on Obama on the issues. They know he can eat their sorry asses alive on the economy, the war, and anything else they're stupid enough to discuss about the reality of this campaign and the condition of the country. The only chance they have is to concentrate on McCain's Redneck Babe and the same tactics that distracted folks from Little George's pathetic performance before the 2004 election.
Obama has got to remain on track. He has to talk about the issues, whether the Swift-Boaters will or not, and he has to yell at the top of his lungs about how they refuse to do so. He also has to remember that the media are not on his side. Four corporations own every TV channel in the country, and they will work for whatever candidate looks best for their business -- whether or not he is good for the country as a whole.
Stay on course, Barack. Stay on target. Beat them over the head with the truth, over and over and over. Issue one comprehensive press release about each attempt to change the subject, identifying it for what it is, and don't get distracted.
They have no shame. If you play into their hands, they'll screw us again.
*After reflection, equating the Republican brass with a ho is insulting to the ho, who, after all, is just a working gal trying to make a living. Now, if we wanted to get specific... No, that's still insulting.
Count Me Out
September 11 is a day to mourn and to reflect. It is not a day to wave the flag. And those who try to use it for that purpose, to promote a cyncial sort of nationalism, are acting inappropriately themselves. They are cheapening the deaths of those who died.The Quaker Agitator
We're Gonna Frickin' Lose this Thing
"Stop saying that!" my wife says to me. But this is not a high school football game and I'm not a cheerleader with a bad attitude. This is an election and as things stand now, we're gonna frickin' lose this thing. Obama and McCain at best are even in the polls nationally and in a recent Gallup poll McCain is ahead by four points.But there's a reason. Read on...
Something is not right. We have a terrific candidate and a terrific VP candidate. We're coming off the worst eight years in our country's history. Six of those eight years the Congress, White House and even the Supreme Court were controlled by the Republicans and the last two years the R's have filibustered like tantrum throwing 4-year-olds, yet we're going to elect a Republican who voted with that leadership 90% of the time and a former sportscaster who wants to teach Adam and Eve as science? That's not odd as a difference of opinion, that's logically and mathematically queer. ...
Adam McKay: We're Gonna Frickin' Lose this Thing
Why rednecks may rule the world
What they are talking about are rednecks. ...
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
The Cuban Issue
The Cubans are stricken with the same international disease as the Haitians: no oil, and nothing to offer rich people. True, there are some large corporations that would like to move some manufacturing to Cuba, where there is a large, well-educated, trainable and willing work force, but generally speaking trade with Cuba, from the standpoint of the politicians, has more liabilities than advantages. Thus, they are stuck in the same position as their close neighbors to the east. Relative poverty, an economy that badly needs a shot in the arm, and little in the way of making it happen.
The situation underlying The Cuban Issue goes back to the revolution in the late '50's. When it became clear that the Batista (and American) island empire was collapsing, a lot of rich folks in the Cuban sugar industry packed up their tents and moved to South Florida, where there was already a thriving community of expats. Looking to the west, at the peat muck of Palm Beach County and the rest of the area immediately south of Lake Okeechobee, they realized that the small holdings of US Sugar in that area were nothing compared to what could be wrung from what was perhaps the largest area of ultra-rich soil in the world.
Thus were born the Cuban Sugar Kings of South Florida. They prospered during the post-revolution years, and have continued to do so by insuring that the much cheaper high grade sugar produced by their former homeland does not reach our shores. They accomplished this by funding the anti-Castro groups in Dade (now Miami-Dade) County, and insuring that every time it looked as though things might be cooling off between the two countries, something happened to provoke hostilities and give an excuse for anti-Castro rhetoric that was lapped up like cafecito by the refugees.
The Sugar cartel also made a point of laying large quantities of cash in the path of various politicians, who were thereby swayed in the direction of their cause: to keep Cuban sugar out of the US until every possible carbohydrate dollar had been wrung from the soil of South Florida. In this way, and by keeping the Cuban population of South Florida convinced that the only way to get Castro out of Cuba was to punish their less fortunate aunts, uncles and cousins, they managed to control a large voting bloc and enough politicians to keep the fantasy going.
And that, my friends, is why we still have no diplomatic relations with a country full of potentially friendly folks, who would love to see their relatives again, host Americans in their resorts, get some money to repair their infrastructure, and generally become part of the Second, if not the First World.
Our politicians, of course, hold to the Sugar Party line that Castro is a dictator, and we don't deal with dictators (unless, of course, they happen to be our dictators -- think Somoza, the Shah, Pinochet, etc., etc.).
The logic is bogus, of course, and only a concerted effort over the years has kept the wool pulled over the eyes of enough people to keep the myth alive. The myth: Castro (now Raul, following Fidel) is an evil dictator; we must starve him out by making sure that no money enters his country from the United States.
Think about it. You want to remove a dictator. He is willing to talk, to compromise. How do you do it?
You normalize relations, let people invest in his country, and really export democracy. When his people find out that it's possible to live a decent life and make a decent living by doing things our way, in a few years the dictator will be history -- and in the meantime everyone (except the sugar kings) will prosper. And besides, if the people are happy and prosperous, what business is it of the US Government who runs the country?
Why hasn't this simple, logical solution been applied? See above.
So the Cubans remain poor. We continue to try to impose our will on the world. Unsuccessfully. And the same bullshit continues. The same. More of the same.
McSame.
Dealing With Diversity
Here in South Florida, we have a real melting pot. We have Southern English, Yankee English, and accents: Caribbean English, Canadian French, Haitian French, Creole, several varieties of Spanish, Mayan, Urdu, Hindi, Chinese and goodness knows what else, and I deal with those folks every day at work.
Don't get me wrong: I'm glad they're here. My ancestors came to this country to make their fortune, speaking a foreign tongue, and I don't for one moment begrudge the chance to anyone else. Neither do I subscribe to the anti-immigration bullshit that the Right uses to terrify their ignorant followers. Immigrants are what made this country what it is -- a vibrant mix of cultures that has developed a civilization unlike any that has ever existed on Earth, or likely ever will again.
The same xenophobic, bigoted crap has been said about every wave of immigrants and other folks who were different, whether it was Indians speaking about my French ancestors, or English talking about my Scotch-Irish ancestors, or those folks talking about my Native American ancestors. I never did buy it, and I never will. I also understand that it's difficult to learn a new language -- impossible after the age of about 14 without an accent, and so difficult for older adults that it might as well be impossible (especially since our cheesy government won't pay for the lessons that would enrich everyone's lives, not just the recipients). I hold in contempt the narrow-minded ignoramuses who believe all the garbage that's spouted about our nation's newcomers.
But, on a purely personal level, I get so tired of dealing with diversity. I'd just like a rest.
Who'd have thought it?
Palin is about as anti-female, in the areas that count, as anyone could be -- and she can get away with it because she's a woman. Any man who took her positions would drive woman away in droves. Was it P. T. Barnum who said "There's a sucker born every minute?" Or was it Karl Rove?
The Fruits of Sensational News Reporting
Monday, September 8, 2008
If you don't like the facts...
Sarah Palin’s much-awaited speech at the Republican National Convention on Wednesday night may have shown she could play the role of attack dog, but it also showed her to be short on facts when it came to touting her own record and going after Obama’s.And ol' Huckleberry oughta know about them eggs.
We found Rudy Giuliani, who introduced her, to be as factually challenged as he sometimes was back when he was in the race. But Mike Huckabee may have laid the biggest egg of all.
FactCheck.org: GOP Convention Spin, Part II
I can't begin to tell you...
Example: I do a bit of tech writing, and I keep track of several tech sites. This morning I cranked one up and read a short blurb about Google's new Chrome (probably the most advanced browser concept since Mosaic). OK article; nothing earthshaking.
But the comments! All this one guy could think of to say is that no one mentioned the several security flaws that have turned up in Chrome so far. I've seen several other remarks on the Web to the effect that it's full of flaws, people expected more of Google, it will never replace (insert name of favorite browser here -- or a projected one like IE8), it's not all that fast, it uses a lot of memory, blah, blah, blah.
OK, people!
Chrome has flaws. The memory use is not one of them, considering what you get for your RAMbytes, but never mind that. This browser -- practically an operating system -- and similar ones are going to change the way you and I interact with our computers, our data, and the Web and Internet (not the same things -- look 'em up). And it's a beta. Not only that, it's a beta that's been in release for less than a week!
Now, for those who don't know, like our friend the hip-shooting commentator, a beta release of an application is made available for testing by the public, if they desire, for the purpose of identifying flaws and eliminating them before they get into the finished product. It is ASSUMED that they will have problems. THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT! I was a beta tester on Firefox back when the version was practically in negative numbers, and -- trust me -- you ain't seen bugs and flaws, brudder.
See, the bottom line is, this guy either doesn't know what he's talking about, or he didn't bother to think about what he was writing and just jumped in to express his two cents worth. And, as it turns out, two cents in 2008 US coin is just about what it was worth, if not less.
This happens so much on the Web. Comments are made without discernible thought, and since it's so easy to do, there is ignorance and sheer crap spread far and wide. Things have reached the point that it's hardly worth wading through all the troll shit to find worthwhile reading on comment threads that your're really interested in. Others aren't worth the trouble at all.
I saw a great quote on one of the Geeks pages (I'd link to it and give credit, but I can't find it) to the rough effect that too many thoughts don't involve enough thinking. Nowhere is this more obvious than on the Web, and nowhere is it more egregious than in comment threads.
So I'm asking you to take the Curmudgeon's Pledge:
I (insert your name here, if you can remember it) do solemnly swear that:
- I will read the entire article or post, think about it, and at least browse the thread, before presuming to favor others with my wisdom.
- I will, at all times, attempt to make my comments understandable.
- I will consider punctuating and capitalizing, if I know how.
- I will try to add something to the discussion, rather than distracting people from what is going on.
- I will keep my comments brief.
- If I have a question, I will type it in the search box and search, not just throw it out for someone to read -- thereby exposing my inability to think for myself.
- I will be courteous.
- I will not respond to personal remarks made by assholes, lest I begin to sound like one myself.
So help me Tim Berners-Lee!
Sunday, September 7, 2008
So, who...
Two simple answers: (1) just another opinionated old fart; and (2) you probably shouldn't pay any attention at all.
Unless you're a pissed off, flaming liberal or progressive. I don't expect to have anything especially new to say here, but I may accidentally come across a way of expressing myself that will resonate. I've got other blogs in other places, and some folks seem to think they're worth reading. I'm not going to send you in that direction because, for one thing, I don't pimp my own blogs. For another, those tend to deal with fairly specific areas.
I'm starting this blog because I want one where I can tweet, vent, complain, act like the curmudgeon I am, and generally get out of my system the spleen that I often feel moved to vent in the direction of -- well, not to put too fine a point on it -- the so-called conservatives who are driving my country into bankruptcy and international opprobrium. (Oh, I'd better mention now that I use big words sometimes. If that bothers you, you're probably not the kind of reader who will hang around here anyway, so don't expect me to pander to your lack of education or self-improvement.)
You may not like it here. Hell, I may not like it here. But if you do, and if you feel so inclined, send a few readers this way. I'm not into self-flagellation. If no one wants to read it, it's OK, but it would be kind of nice, ya know...
Now, a few words about the fake conservatives who've been running the country (into the ground) for the past 12 years. Yes, twelve long years -- since 1996, folks, when they were first able to pull the wool over enough folks' eyes to get them to vote in ways completely unfavorable to their best interest.
What do I call a real conservative? A person who moves carefully; one who considers the implications of his actions not only in the short term, but the long term as well. A man or woman who, before making decisions, gets the best advice available to them, listens to the advisers, and then carefully tempers any actions to take their counsel into account. Fiscally, conservatives...conserve. They don't spend money unnecessarily, and make every effort to use it wisely. They avoid using credit whenever possible, preferring to work with assets on hand rather than going into debt. Socially, they are inclined to live and let live. They see no reason to make major changes in either government or society, and seek to effect those that may be necessary in ways least obstructive to other people. They manage international relations the same way, understanding that there are a great many things that, once done, cannot be undone. They utilize diplomacy to minimize the need for other measures. Only as a last resort do they use force, when all other options have genuinely been unsuccessful.
They don't lie, because they don't need to. They are the epitome of Teddy Roosevelt's "Walk softly, but carry a big stick." They are gentlemen and gentlewomen. They know a hawk from a handsaw.
Now, if that sounds to you like the current administration, then you are an idiot plain and (very) simple, and you will not be happy here. Just leave. Don't bother to make scurrilous comments, because I'll just delete them or make fun of you. If you have something worthwhile to say, you're welcome to say it, but I'll be the judge. You don't have "freedom of speech" on private sites. That applies to government interference with freedom of expression, not mine. If you'd bother to learn how your country works, you'd already know that. See the House Rules for repetitive and even more insulting details.
Just fucking leave, and try to find some way to keep busy on November 4th -- go fishing, or drink beer or kill a moose or something -- because the country doesn't need any more of your help.